PLO10 – Project’s Storyboard (30%)

Attribute	0 – 2 Marks	3 – 5 Marks	6 – 8 Marks	9 – 10 Marks
The Pitch	Does not explain the project outcome	Explains only a general plan for the video project	Shows the details of the project, including all requested components	Persuasively written; addresses all necessary components in details
Storyboard	Does not represent the sequence of shots in the video. Storyboard descriptions are vague or incomplete	Sketches are in a logical sequence, but do not give adequate descriptions of the video scenes, audio background, or dialogue notes	Includes sketches of each video scene and includes some planned descriptions, audio notes, effects notes, and dialog for every scene	Demonstrates detailed planning on the video shot sequence, scene descriptions, audio and effects notes, and dialog for every scene
Information Gathering	Very little or no source information was collected	Source information collected for graphics, facts and quotes, but not documented in desired format	Source information collected for all graphics, facts and quotes. Most documented in desired format	Source information collected for all graphics, facts and quotes. All documented in desired format

PLO4 – Oral Presentation (10%)

Attribute	0 – 2 Marks	3 – 5 Marks	6 – 8 Marks	9 – 10 Marks
Clear voice	The voice is unclear and challenging to understand. Pronunciation and articulation issues hinder the presentation’s effectiveness	Some clarity in the voice, but occasional mumbling or speaking too softly makes it difficult for the audience to follow	Generally clear voice with proper pronunciation and good audibility. The presentation is easy to follow for most of the time	Exceptionally clear and articulate voice. The speaker’s voice enhances the presentation, ensuring the audience can easily understand and grasp the content
Engagement & Delivery	Poor engagement with the audience. Monotonous or hesitant delivery that fails to maintain audience interest	Some attempts to engage the audience, but delivery may be inconsistent or lack enthusiasm	Engages the audience moderately through appropriate eye contact, gestures, and a reasonably enthusiastic delivery	Highly engaging and captivating delivery. Maintains the audience’s attention throughout the presentation with confident body language, excellent eye contact, and a compelling speaking style

PLO4 – Video Presentation (20%)

Attribute	0 – 2 Marks	3 – 5 Marks	6 – 8 Marks	9 – 10 Marks
Seamless Transitions	Transitions between scenes or segments noticeably abrupt, causing disruption in the flow of the video and making it challenging to follow	Some attempts at transitions are made, but they lack smoothness or coherence, resulting in occasional disruptions in the video’s flow	Transitions are generally smooth and contribute to the video’s overall flow and coherence, but there may be a few instances where improvements could be made	Transitions between scenes or segments are seamless and enhance the video’s flow and coherence, creating a cohesive viewing experience
Narration Quality	Poor narration quality. Narration is unclear, monotonous, or difficult to understand, hindering the video’s effectiveness	Narration is somewhat clear, but there may be issues with pronunciation, tone, or pacing, impacting the video’s engagement	Narration is clear, engaging, and well-paced. The voiceover complements the visuals and content, keeping the audience interested	Excellent narration with a captivating voice. The narration adds significant value to the video, making it a compelling presentation of Terengganu’s heritage and culture
Engaging Visual Content	Visual content is poorly integrated and does not effectively support the narration.	Visual content is limited or does not consistently support the narration, affecting audience engagement.	Visual content generally supports the narration, but some improvements could enhance engagement.	Visual content effectively complements the narration and enhances audience understanding and engagement
Mechanics	The video presentation contains numerous spelling and grammar errors, significantly impacting the clarity of the content	The video presentation includes some misspellings and/or grammatical errors, which occasionally affect the clarity of the content	The video presentation has a few minor misspellings and/or grammatical errors, demonstrating a strong grasp of spelling and grammar. The overall presentation is clear and mostly error-free	The video presentation is virtually free from misspellings and grammatical errors, showcasing exceptional language skills and attention to detail. The content is conveyed with clarity

PLO10 – Video Project (20%)

Attribute	0 – 2 Marks	3 – 5 Marks	6 – 8 Marks	9 – 10 Marks
Multimedia Integration	Multimedia elements appear randomly placed or detract from the user experience, hindering the conveyance of the relationship between mathematical concepts and the local heritage and culture. The integration lacks coherence, impacting the overall effectiveness of the multimedia project.	Some multimedia elements feel disjointed and do not add to the user experience in conveying the relationship between mathematical concepts and the local heritage and culture. Minor adjustments are needed to enhance the integration and overall impact of the project.	Multimedia elements are adequately integrated into the project and support the user experience with minor distractions. The relationship between mathematical concepts and the local heritage and culture is discernible, but there is room for improvement in ensuring seamless integration.	Multimedia elements are seamlessly integrated, with no visible distractions, resulting in an outstanding user experience that effectively conveys the relationship between mathematical concepts and the local heritage and culture. The multimedia integration significantly enhances the project’s impact and visual appeal.
Video Footage	There are frequent disruptions or interruptions in the video, affecting its overall cohesiveness and clarity, and detracting from the message related to mathematical concepts and local heritage and culture.	Some disruptions or interruptions are present in the video, impacting its flow and coherence and making it challenging for viewers to grasp the connection between mathematical concepts and local heritage and culture.	The footage flows smoothly with minimal disruptions or interruptions, facilitating a clear presentation of the relationship between mathematical concepts and local heritage and culture.	The footage flows seamlessly and is skillfully edited, resulting in a captivating viewing experience, successfully showcasing the relationship between mathematical concepts and local heritage and culture and elevating the overall impact of the multimedia project.
Lighting and Green Screen	The subject is poorly lit, resulting in strong shadows and heavy green spillage.	The subject is reasonably lit to match the lighting of the new background, but some inconsistencies in lighting and shadows make the subject appear unnatural within the scene.	The lighting on the subject is well-balanced, minimizing shadows and green spillage. The subject appears well-integrated into the new environment with consistent lighting.	The lighting on the subject and the green screen is perfectly managed, resulting in no visible shadows or green reflections. The subject appears genuinely present in the new environment, and there are no distractions.
Copyright and Intellectual Property	There is no evidence of proper attribution or permission for copyrighted materials used in the project.	Some attempts at attributing copyrighted materials are made, but they are incomplete or inconsistent.	The project incorporates some copyrighted content under fair use guidelines or with appropriate licenses, but there may be a few minor oversights.	The project uses copyrighted materials responsibly and is in compliance with fair use guidelines.

PLO10 – AR Project (20%)

Attribute	0 – 2 Marks	3 – 5 Marks	6 – 8 Marks	9 – 10 Marks
Technical Proficiency	The AR project demonstrates significant technical issues, errors, or limitations. AR elements may not function as intended, and the overall performance is compromised	The AR project shows some technical competence, but there are noticeable areas of improvement. Some AR elements function correctly, but there may be occasional glitches or performance limitations	The AR project exhibits a good level of technical proficiency. Most AR elements work as expected, with only minor technical issues that do not significantly impact the overall experience	The AR project showcases exceptional technical proficiency. All AR elements function flawlessly, demonstrating a high level of technical skill and attention to detail
Interactivity (marker)	The AR project lacks meaningful interactivity. Users have limited or no opportunities to interact with the AR elements, resulting in a passive experience	The AR project includes some basic interactive elements, but there may be limited in scope or not fully responsive to user actions	The AR project offers a reasonable level of interactivity. Users can engage with the AR elements through various interactions, providing a somewhat immersive experience	The AR project excels in interactivity. Users have multiple and engaging ways to interact with the AR elements, resulting in a highly immersive and interactive experience
Animation	No animation elements are used, or the animation elements are unclear and poorly organized, with inappropriate choice of characters.	The animation elements used are clearer and somewhat organized, but improvements are needed. Good choices of characters.	Animation idea is well-adapted to the project’s theme with appropriate, relevant, organized, and visually appealing elements. Good, neat, and attractive choice of characters	Animation idea is exceptionally creative and aligned with the project’s theme. The elements are professionally executed, organized, and visually appealing. Excellent choice of characters, enhancing the animation’s impact
Creativity	The AR project demonstrates little to no creativity. It relies heavily on standard or pre-existing AR elements, lacking originality or unique ideas	The AR project shows some degree of creativity, but it could benefit from more original ideas and a stronger emphasis on unique features	The AR project displays good creativity, incorporating some original elements and demonstrating unique ideas and enhance the AR experience	The AR project exhibits exceptional creativity. It showcases novel ideas, presenting a highly engaging and distinct AR experience that stands out from typical AR projects